AlisQI Ideas

Currently the AlisQI permission management works on the analysis set level. However, for some cases it might be beneficial to restrict access to fields. This would allow users to assign sections of an analysis set to particular user group. This would provide a better guidance on what they can see, and limit unwanted behavior regarding changing result values.

Currently you can use the field visibility option to only show certain fields based on a selection (from a required index field). It is only possible to do this once per analysis set. It would be nice to add more of these selection based fields in one analysis set.

We are finding scenarios where we need to be able to have selection lists that are dependent on the choices of other selection lists in a form. This would give us better control on which options are available to select. An example of where this could help currently is with our Management of Change process. We have an Impact field that is dependent on the Type of change. For example, if the type of change is "Replace/Upgrade Equipment" the impact of this change can be "Like Kind Replacement", "Low", "Moderate", or "High". Whereas, if the type of change is "New Equipment", the impact is always "Moderate" or "High" because it introduces new process and/or risks. Right now we have no easy way to eliminate the "Like Kind Replacement" or "Low" options from the Impact field in this scenario.

Currently rights management is done by groups. However in relatively small company where employees can have multiple roles assigned to them, or that you have a specific department with multiple people with different rules, it can get difficult to arrange the rights properly based on groups. If there would be an option to check on/off rights options within a specific permissions group per individual, that would help the situation I currently have and not resort having to create groups with 1 employee each in which I then assign individual rights based on the group.

A dark mode for ALIS would be nice to have. In my opinion it's more pleasant to look at

The option in the workflow menu to automatically add an attachment/Reporting template to a result.

A reporting Template that is added to a result and continuously has the most recent data in it. So it will automatic refresh to the newest available data.

We have come across a couple of scenarios where it would be very helpful to have the ability to select multiple options from a selection list. Currently, we can only accomplish the desired outcome by having multiple selection lists. Here are a couple of examples where these multi-select options would be helpful. Example 1: Safety incident classification. Depending on the severity of an incident, it could be classified as high-potential (HiPo), Serious Injury or Fatality (SIF), Life-saving Rule Violation (LSRV), Vehicle Involved, Stop Work Authority Used (SWA). One or more of these classifications can apply to any incident. Currently we have a separate field for each with its own checkbox or yes:no selection list. Example 2: As part of an incident investigation, we add the names or employee IDs of every employee or external person involved in the incident. Currently we have to use a text field to capture this list which makes the data prone to entry errors.